Scan your phone's home screen really quick. Of the apps on your home screen, how many of them are made up of lists?
Weird question, I know, but take a second to think about it. A majority of the products we interact with through our screens can be boiled down to a collection of lists.
Despite the evolution of the user interface, design trends and technological advances, data is naturally going to exist within lists.
In the early 2000's, a lot of websites looked kind of like Digg. Interfaces were finally starting to get semi-creative with color and hierarchy but mostly it was just a lot of text in a nicely formatted list.
Then along came the "card" and we started getting stuff that looked like this (still a list, by the way). Ooooo, ahhhhhh!
In recent years, interfaces have gotten cleaner and gone through a handful of trends like Neumorphism and Kawaiization, but as you might have guessed, it's all still just a list with a different coat of paint.
Everything is a list. So what? Because… lists are not only a vehicle for information organization.
Let’s break it down. When most people think of a list, it's typically a conduit to the real value. Like a hallway with a bunch of doors with labels on them. You stroll down the hallway until you find the door to the room you want and then you enter.
But this view of lists is 2D. There's a third dimension 🤯
The third dimension is the data provided by the list itself. Data that can dramatically alter a user's experience.
Disclaimer: This is example is not based off of real companies or real experiences.
Let's assume that both of these popular (and fictitious) search companies have dialed in their search algorithms to the point that they could consistently return the same top 10 search results.
Now let's say Doogle's algorithm is just a bit better at filtering out the text-heavy SEO plays vs. the content written by a human for a human. So they're able to put the best piece of content out of those 10 at the top.
GuckGuckGo, on the other hand, hasn't quite figured out that "last mile delivery" yet and they rank that same piece of content in the 5th slot in the search results.
If the user's expectation is that the best, most relevant content shows up at the top, the experience will be radically different despite Doogle and GuckGuckGo generally serving up the same stuff.
In this scenario, the list is an incredibly valuable, subliminal data point for the user. Even if they skimmed the titles and ended up clicking on the 5th and best result first, there's a bit of inherent mistrust in the search engine. It wasn't able to truly serve up the best content in that top slot. And in time, that slightly worse user experience will send them running back to Doogle.
The list's data is subtle - people intuitively ingest and process those data points but rarely think about them explicitly.
But it's our job to think about them explicitly. So let's dig in (with examples, of course).
The data points we just went through are powerful ways of helping the user find the information they're looking for. And if most product experiences are made up of lists, list manipulation tools like searching, sorting, filtering, and scanning become incredibly important for passing the control back to the user.